JamieG Analysis

JamieG looks deep into the ramifications of current trends in Technology and Media

JamieG Analysis header image 2

The tend towards an open STB continues.

June 13th, 2008 · 2 Comments

A common topic I cover on my blog is what the Set top box of the future is likely to be. Recently in my post named “Discussion with Philip Hodgetts about the digital TV future.”, Philip and I covered many aspects of this idea.  Recently a number of developments connected to this topic have surfaced.  I wanted to tie them all together here.

They are:

I would like to point out that these stores have all come out in no less then a month.  Thats a lot of action in the STB area.

Still, I find this all very worrying as unlike the past, there is no one driving the development of what I like to compare to as the Analog TV Tuner of past to todays Internet-TV-Tuner of the future.

In the past, organisations such as SMPTE where formed so that the development of TV technologies was based around standards.  Content was structured and produced in a documented way as so it could then be trasnsmitted in a standard way. Any TV manufactuer could simply follow these standards and have a working TV set on the market.

Altho these standards bodies exist and an attempt by them has been made to address the issues of Internet TV, the current state of play is that it is a complete mess.  We have many suppliers using proprietory technologies, trying to leverage their products into a dominent position.

These organisations are very powerful and have, in my opinion, stifeled any movement towards simple open standards for which would allow the adoption of Internet TV to take off.

There is a lot of potential power and money at stake, so no one is willing to “play ball” so to speak.

Fortunatly the technological tuth to all this is that open based STB are inevitable.

For Example.  Lets look at DVD region coding.  This was a way to let the distributors control the release of content around the world.  The movie would be released in the US, for example, under REGION-1.  Here in Australia, Region-6, we would not be able to play that DVD.

Strangely enough, I have never had a problem with this as REGION-FREE DVD players came out very quickly.  REGION-coding today is next to useless.  Consumers eventually learnt about these issues, and today, the consumer electronics stores simply will not stock Region-restricted DVD players are they simply cannot sell them.

The AppleTV for example is already in this bucket.  A consumer who is interested in a AppleTV is as, he is knowledgeable enough to understand that purchasing an AppleTV only really means he can watch shows blessed by Steve, of pod-casts specifically designed for it. (You can hack it to do anything however)

A potential consumer of an AppleTV would understand Torrents, and that alternative content is around, and that obviously, anything he purchases, he will want to also play that content.

This may look to be a trivial matter, but from my experience it is quite the opposite.

The standard TV set of the future is going to need a TV tuner of the future, ie an Internet TV tuner.  This tuner technology needs to be cheap but at the same time as powerful as possible.  I am a big fan of the Adobe mythology as it is possible that each CHANNEL can load its own user interface designed specifically for the target consumer. It can also be easily updated.  Ie the way you use the channel can evolve with the user.  The complexity can evolve with the user.  The Social aspects of the channel can evolve with the evolution of social networks.

The STB of the future still looks like its a fair way down the road. I just hope the incumbent players who are trying to take advantage of this realise sooner then later that we need to get together and head down this road collaboratively soon.  As the longer they procrastinate, the more likely we are to damage the production industry and ultimately the TV shows we love to watch.  At the current rate of development, nether side will end up with very much.

Tags: Adobe · Apple · DRM · Film Making · IPTV · Microsoft · Sony · Standards

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 thierry fautier // Jun 16, 2008 at 2:12 am

    James

    I fully agree with your analysis, but it might take a while before everyone agrees on a single standard on how to present internet content on TV. The closest to that is what has been standardized and deployed for IPTV in Japan, but this is still walled garden.
    One way to look at it is to use web technology and see how this can be mapped on TV or open STB.
    I would like to dig further on the “right” user experience of internet video on TV. Custom web interface (like Verismo is trying to do) for every site will require a lot of work, will not provide the same interface to end user when he goes from PC to TV and it might also disrupt the ad model that is now getting stronger on PC.
    On the other hand full browser experience on TV might work for some sites built purposely for TV viewing, but it looks like the best compromise is what Apple is doing short term on iphone with scrolling and scaling (need good HW support for that).
    If this is solved properly it could open the gate of internet TV content to our TVs.

    Thierry

  • 2 JamieG // Jun 16, 2008 at 8:21 am

    Thierry,
    I know Apple appears to be the “man of the moment” when it comes to digital distribution, however, I have to disagree that Apple is in any way helping this issue. Apple is like all the other large, “Take Over the world”, companies. It is just Apple are much smarter and understand the tactic of making users want to be taken over. But at the end of the day, later on, when you look around, you relasise you have volentarily walked into a walled garden. Now you want to move past this. But cannot.

    The right stance a company should take at this is much more like Google and Android. I am actually surprised Google has not launched Android into a STB platform as well. Maybe they focus on “Where the ball is going to be” approch more. But really, they are simply putting there endorsement and technical strength behind a product that can be used by anyone for any purpose they can imagine. No strings. Their reasons appear to be to open up the wider use of the internet and therefore expand internet advertising and ultimatly their profits (And one could say control of the internet, but thats another story)

    Apple/Steve is all about controling the experience. This may, in the short term, improve the experiance some what, but in the long term, being controlled are what Wars are made of.

    If Apple completely opened the AppleTV, which I have been told is extremely unlikely, Apple is unlikely to be part of this open STB.

    James

Leave a Comment